The new variant reduced unintended changes in DNA compared to its wildtype, suggesting it could play a role in gene therapies that require high precision. The study by researchers from Karolinska Institutet’s Ming Wai Lau Centre of Reparative Medicine in Hong Kong is published in the journal PNAS.
‘A new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9 variant was found to boost precision in gene editing. ’
In its current form, however, it faces several challenges. One version, the Cas9 nuclease from the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9), has a high target precision but can be too large for the viral particle needed to deliver the gene editing kit to the cells. Another version, the Cas9 nuclease from the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9), is much smaller and can easily fit into the so-called adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector that transports the toolkit, but it lacks an equally high precision level. Imprecise gene-editing can end up modifying DNA at unintended places with potentially serious consequences.
In the current study, the researchers identified an engineered variant dubbed SaCas9-HF that significantly improved the accuracy of gene targeting across 24 places in human cells in a laboratory setting. The SaCas9-HF reduced off-target activities by about 90 percent for gene sequences that are highly similar and therefore tend to be prone to unintended editing when using wild-type SaCas9. For gene sequences that typically have fewer editing misses, the SaCas9-HF had nearly undetectable off-target activity.
“Our finding provides an alternative to the wild-type Cas9 toolbox – a new SaCas9 where highly precise genome editing is needed,” says Zongli Zheng, assistant professor at the Ming Wai Lau Centre for Reparative Medicine at Karolinska Institutet in Hong Kong. “The new enzyme will be particularly useful for future gene therapy using adeno-associated viral (AAV) to deliver genome editing components in vivo.”
More research on additional target sites and cell types are needed to determine if the SaCas9-HF variant is equally precise across different cell types, although the researchers say they are optimistic about its application across many other cell types.
In terms of how good the enzyme was in modifying the intended genomic locations, the SaCas9-HF had an average on-target efficiency of 80 percent compared to the wild-type, which is generally considered comparable in the current field, according to the researchers. In some CRISPR-Cas9 cases, a 10 percent editing efficiency is enough to repair the damaged gene sequence and restore function.
The post appeared first on http://feeds.feedburner.com/allhealthnews